Skip to main content
Favorite
Add To List
Holly Falk-Krzesinski

Holly Falk-Krzesinski

Vice President, Research Intelligence, Elsevier
Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, PhD is the Vice President, Research Intelligence on the Global Strategic Networks team at Elsevier, an information analytics company. Her key role is building and maintaining long term relationships with research institutions and funding bodies, giving voice to research leaders at those organizations within Elsevier to help the business deliver the most impactful solutions to support research globally. Dr. Falk-Krzesinski also focuses on how open science is advancing, in particular, how institutions are addressing issues of recognition and reward for research data sharing throughout the research life cycle. Prior to joining Elsevier, Dr. Falk-Krzesinski was a faculty member and administrator at Northwestern University. Notably, she launched the central Office of Research Development and examined the use of various tools to support intra- and inter-institutional scientific collaboration and demonstrate the impact of the university’s research programs. She also investigated how universities are changing structures to reward engagement in interdisciplinary research and team science.

Matching Videos

1 Matching Videos
The primary selling point of metrics for the academic researcher was the promise that the proof provided by such metrics of the value of one’s work would be the increased and long-term funding needed to do such work. Prestige, tenure, influence, even celebrity -- these have been stepping stones to securing significant (and much-needed) grants to educational institutions of all sizes and types. But have these incentives been subverted over time or in specific ways? Is the drive to publish-or-perish the best mechanism for encouraging substantive study? The integrity of the publishing process and perhaps the integrity of the funding model for higher education itself is at stake. This session will look at some of the troubling questions surrounding the incentives offered to the working scholar, researcher, and scientist. Presenters in this virtual conference will consider the following questions: · How might institutions and research facilities best weld available indicators of use or influence into a meaningful metric? · If individual scholarship is best gauged by the value assigned to it by the larger community, then what collection of metrics should be gathered for purposes of determining appropriate rewards in the context of academia? · How might institutions better address this challenge and reward faculty appropriately?

We are NISO, the National Information Standards Organization. We’re the place where information professionals turn for industry standards that enable them to work together. Let us help keep you informed about what’s happening at NISO and in the wider information community by signing up for emails in your area(s) of interest.